[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Indonesian ISP Moratel announces Google's prefixes
Apologize for calling it an prefix hijack. I misunderstood in start.
Clearly it was case of prefix leaking.
(Sent from my mobile device)
On Nov 7, 2012 11:22 AM, "joel jaeggli" <joelja at bogus.com> wrote:
> On 11/7/12 12:13 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> On Nov 07, 2012, at 00:07 , Jian Gu <guxiaojian at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Where did you get the idea that a Moratel customer announced a
>>> prefix to Moratel and Moratel did not have the proper filters in place?
>>> according to the blog, all google's 4 authoritative DNS server networks
>>> 126.96.36.199/24 were wrongly routed to Moratel, what's the possiblity for a
>>> Moratel customers announce all those prefixes?
>> Ah, right, they just leaked Google's prefix. I thought a customer
>> originated the prefix.
>> Original question still stands. Which attribute do you expect Google to
>> set to stop this?
>> Hint: Don't say No-Advertise, unless you want peers to only talk to the
>> adjacent AS, not their customers or their customers' customers, etc.
>> Looking forward to your answer.
> I would expect that moratel should have a route object which their transit
> providers can construct a prefix filter for. if moratel advertised an AS
> path including themselves and a google orgin pccw should not have accepted
> it. if they originated the prefix, pccw should not have accepted it.