[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if you can.
In any event, I'm pretty sure that I'd rather get hit with "tampering with
evidence" versus them retrieving data that may incriminate me. I believe
this may be a the "lesser of two evils" game.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.creyts at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 2:52 PM
> To: Jeroen van Aart
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please
> help if you can.
> In most jurisdictions, wouldn't using a de-gaussing ring in the door
> frame to wipe any equipment being removed constitute "tampering with
> evidence" or interfering with an investigation if the authority in
> question is in possession of a warrant/subpoena?
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen at mompl.net>
> > On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
> >> OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I
> > for awhile? I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get
> > your
> >> stuff, and leave town. I think you have seen way to many movies.
> > So if the cops show up at his door tomorrow and say "Here's all your
> >> stuff back, there was no evidence of a crime.", you are OK with this
> >> guys keeping the "defense fund"?
> > I for one vote for installing a de-gauging ring in your door frame.
> > any removal of equipment you don't approve of will be wiped. That and
> > encryption possibly combined with hiding the "real" OS (truecrypt can
> > do that).
> > Greetings,
> > Jeroen
> > --
> > Earthquake Magnitude: 5.1
> > Date: Monday, December 17, 2012 17:46:48 UTC
> > Location: central East Pacific Rise
> > Latitude: -3.9682; Longitude: -104.0375
> > Depth: 15.70 km
> Kyle Creyts
> Information Assurance Professional
> BSidesDetroit Organizer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2739 bytes
Desc: not available