[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ipv6 transit over tunneled connection



AT&T has told us that they will have IPv6 on their MIS circuits Q2 2011. 
Deltacom has told us the same. 

We will be testing native IPv6 with both these carriers on GE Internet
circuits sometime around Q3. 


?
-Hammer-
?
"I was a normal American nerd."
-Jack Herer
?
?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Carrozzo [mailto:jack at crepinc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:01 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

We pick up v6 from HE currently (like the rest of the world). L3 offered us
dual stack also, but they wanted money to set it up plus MRC. None of our
Bits That Matter (tm) go over v6 anyhow. (I guess the right phrase would be
"revenue producing bits").

-Jack Carrozzo

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared at puck.nether.net]
> > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:49 PM
> > To: Jack Carrozzo
> > Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> > Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
> >
> > I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6
> > plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
> >
> > I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be
> > presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
> >
> > What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
> >
>
> We don't see Savvis, Level3, or AboveNet with IPv6 capabilities in our
> region (DC).  Two years ago, neither Verizon or AT&T had IPv6, either.
Not
> sure about them now, as we no longer use them for transit.  One would
think
> everyone would have v6 capabilities in the heart of government territory,
> but okay.
>
> For whatever reason, Verio actually charges (or used to) for their IPv6
> separately from IPv4 and to top it all off, it wasn't significantly
> discounted.
>
> -evt
>
>
>