Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

• Subject: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
• From: jimpop at gmail.com (Jim Popovitch)
• Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:53:35 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco <jgreco at ns.sol.net> wrote:
> "Looking around" Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
>
> "Looking around" where you're in my back yard and peeking in the windows
> is, at a minimum, trespass, and if our local cops notice you doing it, you
> can expect that you may find yourself ... severely inconvenienced.
>
> There is no "freedom to look around" on private property, despite what you
> appear to think.

Isn't Rockefeller Center private property?   ;-)

-Jim P.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
    • From: charles at thewybles.com (Charles Wyble)

• References:
  • Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
    • From: kngspook at gmail.com (Neil)
  • Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
    • From: jgreco at ns.sol.net (Joe Greco)

• Prev by Date: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
• Next by Date: Sprint latency
• Previous by thread: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
• Next by thread: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread