[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] Internet addressing history section

On 02/13/2019 08:57 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> Anyway, although I can add a lot more to the arpanet portion of the 
> history section, and probably will, my current working draft of the 
> history section of this document is now up here:
> https://github.com/dtaht/ipv4-cleanup/blob/master/rfcs/draft-gilmore-taht-v4uniext.txt#L117
> Feel free to make suggestions for more (or less!) content, comment as to 
> my mental state, ancestry, naivety, and overall correctness of the cites - 
> I note that the last cite I added today was rfc1925, which really should 
> get cited more often.

Should the test-networks and / or link-local be included in the martian 

Is the benchmark network,, still used for such?  Or could 
it also be reclaimed?

Aside:  Is there a reason that you're using the octothorpe (#) instead 
of the section symbol (?) when citing RFC sections?

Grant. . . .
unix || die