[ih] .UK vs .GB

• Subject: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
• Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:27:06 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAGS=b9Dz1Wf4cf-esRPmjcAk4m2A8Ft_kBbG7PcOFFbb7pNy4A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On 04/14/2018 09:07 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 14/04/2018 20:42, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>> The choice of GB in the ISO code was, almost certainly, for this reason.
> 
> Not sure who you were quoting there, but it wasn't me.
> 

No, it wasn't. Those are my words. Not sure how they end up appearing to 
be quoted.

• References:
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: agoldmanster at gmail.com (Alexander Goldman)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik Fältström)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)

• Prev by Date: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by Date: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Previous by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread