[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00

To: Paul Ebersman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
From: David Bird <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:04:55 -0800
Archived-at: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/xcBnL8K1z1fDhA3SK2IdoTjEZoA>
Authentication-results: ietfc.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Mark Nottingham <[email protected]>, Martin Thomson <[email protected]>, Dave Dolson <[email protected]>
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=EMl7d1HN40u/4co5F8W4sNpozvBa4WLRHR49EYE1qDk=; b=dxyQDRlFUp2dCFE60idALigNRw0bXqtJG0u6DNLXWWear5AOQQmhPMr8PzOXG4gO+l nrxt054eIc/z974vm9qu8WU1ioT6NBpYfbRcrjxDafRpHDl0WA2QbA3WF9HjluX4Bh29 GJZL6j7HzbuO3uw5s6x4MSJ8nS88+ZEUCA4rELQUj7Ez1AOo0gky41OZppDfyfdlN3mn eeE2PSOJU+DX6aGpG/lxdbygZOvdgI1LvNH0jFfMHHSSvT0wdL1X7UJ/aOTxQ26mXpKA UK4xiqw4+85JiyigvECVU1z1hcDpWo9IPu1AtBCl7tlIkkCVGcfQ6Bu2oT40ZJhd90KN Wkjg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
List-archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]m> <D3030A8C.12AEFF%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om>

Sorry, link was to wrong version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-01

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 AM, David Bird <[email protected]> wrote:

+1 for an ICMP solution ... https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-00

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Paul Ebersman <[email protected]> wrote:

ddolson> Regarding non-browser clients, even non-HTTP clients, and
ddolson> considering this is the IETF, it seems reasonable to find an
ddolson> IP-layer solution vs. an HTTP-layer solution.

Indeed... All sorts of phone apps don't use HTTP but need to tickle the
reaction.

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals

References:
- [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Martin Thomson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Dave Dolson <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: Paul Ebersman <[email protected]>
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
  - From: David Bird <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Next by Date: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Previous by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Next by thread: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread