[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00



Sorry, link was to wrong version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-01

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:00 AM, David Bird <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for an ICMP solution ... https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-capport-icmp-unreach-00

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Paul Ebersman <[email protected]> wrote:

ddolson> Regarding non-browser clients, even non-HTTP clients, and
ddolson> considering this is the IETF, it seems reasonable to find an
ddolson> IP-layer solution vs. an HTTP-layer solution.

Indeed... All sorts of phone apps don't use HTTP but need to tickle the
reaction.

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals