[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Captive-portals] CAPPORT meeting at IETF95 in Buenos Aires.

OK, so here's two minor comments:
  • Your markdown-to-RFC tool misses out on asterisks that are being used for bold text, and remain in the TXT version (Sec. 3).
  • In Sec. 2.1, we need to use the word "consent". Captive portals not only present information, but require user interaction to indicate the user's acceptance of terms of service.

Thanks,
    Yaron


On 02/16/2016 01:24 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:




On 16 Feb 2016, at 4:46 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:

Mark Nottingham is already working on a "problem statement" type draft with outlines some of this, but we'd like more viewpoints/ discussions.





Please!






His initial submission is here: "Before You Log In, Here's A Brief Message From Our Sponsors!" - draft-nottingham-capport-problem (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-capport-problem/)





... and that's really just a regurgitation of what we previously put together at <https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/Captive-Portals>.  If people have suggestions, corrections, pull requests, etc. I'm all ears.

Cheers,



--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals