[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] Actually getting work done....
I'll be happy to contribute to the drafts.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Captive-portals [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Warren Kumari
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 11:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Captive-portals] Actually getting work done....
> Hi there all,
> So, over the weekend I finally got a chance to go back through the
> audio recordings and complete the minutes (the Etherpad died during
> the meeting and so we'd lost the end of the meeting -- please take a
> look at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/minutes/minutes-93-capport
> and let us know if we've misunderstood / misrepresented anything... )
> During the meeting a number of people expressed the opinion that what
> we need is:
> 1: a taxonomy of captive portal types, and security considerations for each
> 2: a document that outlines the different sets of interests that CP
> deployers have / industry survey. Why do captive portal players do
> what they do? What do they run a CP ($$$ / AUP/Legal / Marketing)? Why
> do they bypass the CP probe URLs (desire for a full featured browser?
> bloodymindedness? something else?)
> A large number of people supported that this work should happen, and a
> number of people even put their hands indicating that they were
> willing to contribute -- unfortunately we didn't capture who...
> So, presuming a WG is formed, who is willing to edit / author these
> initial documents?
> Don't be shy!
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [email protected]