[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

latest false flag attack?



I find the work by the 9/11 Consensus Panel to be the best-documented, most
detailed, and most sober set of questions about the event that I've read.

they have quite a bit of good evidence collected regarding WTC 7, both the
official and plausible stories about what brought it down, and the
questions that they think remain. I agree with them. The explanations are
ad hoc, often stretching the limits of credulity, often at odds with
whatever physical evidence remains, and as in WTC 1 and 2, posit a
mechanism for building collapse that, whatever else you think about it, has
never been seen before or since, despite the fact that planes do crash into
buildings and fires do happen in buildings pretty frequently.

all their stuff is worth going through, but here's the WTC 7 material:

http://www.consensus911.org/the-911-consensus-points/#WTC71

- z


On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:37 AM grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> Show docs / pics of any significant damage to 7 attributed and
> accepted by analysts as being from *planes* bits. 7 appears done
> by the north tower ejecting into it, and resulting fire.
>
> Anyway, 9/11 was done by governments fuckery around the world.
>
> Which in the worst cases, were peaceful dissolutions to fail,
> would take excess efforts to root them out...
>
> https://www.cbsnews.com/news/shadow-government-news-to-congress/
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2008 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20180920/3cf7e1d1/attachment.txt>