[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cpunks censorship?



> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      [email protected]

 [email protected]

 cyphercypherpunks

There is your problem.

Calm down, people.  You may resume your bitching.

-Shelley



----------
On February 25, 2016 3:13:37 PM juan <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:01:59 +0000
> From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]>
> To: jim bell <[email protected]>, [email protected],
> [email protected] Cc: [email protected], Steve Kinney
> <[email protected]> Subject: from Zenaan - was Fwd: Delivery Status
> Notification (Failure)
>
>
> OK, new threads by me are definitely getting rejected, and
> instantaneously too...
>
> Due to a separate rejection, I take it that cross-posting has also
> been banned for my email address.
>
> I will not do any run around of creating (or using) an alternate email
> address especially for cp@.
> That's just an arms race and as I've always said:
> - it has been and remains my intention to respect the intentions of
> the founders/ creators of this mailing list
>
> So whoever is running/ administrating this list has decided they want
> to clip my wings. In principle that's fair enough, BUT:
>
> - no one ever emailed me offlist or onlist saying that they are an
> administrator of the list and that they wanted me to post less, or to
> meet some other conditions
> - such behaviour is cowardly, like a stab in the back
> - such behaviour provides no opportunity for me to respect the
> administrator(s) of the list - since they never owned up to being an
> administrator, and never admitted to me their requirements about
> posting less or in some other way, they are being cowardly and
> providing no opportunity to me, to meet their requirements
> - I do not accept cowardly behaviour from list administrators
> - I thought cp@ was not a list of cowards, or for cowards
>
> I am not interested in participating in half a mailing list (one where
> I can only receive emails and reply to other people, but not post new
> threads and not cross-post).
>
> I am not interested in participating in a mailing list where temporary
> (or permanent) restrictions are put in place without notice to the
> person being restricted. I will not accept such cowardly behaviour.
>
> SO, short of the cypherpunks list administrator(s) apologising to me
> for their cowardliness, and reinstating my posting privileges for my
> primary email address, and stating clearly their requirements for
> posting to the list, and doing this publicly on the list so other
> people know the requirements for posting to the list, then I shall
> remove myself from this so-called "community" and find some other
> place where who I am is respected, and where cowards are told to grow
> the fuck up! Some place where children are not pretending they're
> adults with their cowardly behaviour.
>
> Alex, Juan, Jim, coderman and Steve, in one way or another you have
> eached gained my respect. Thank you each for being who you are. If any
> of you have a suggestion for an alternate mailing list, I would
> certainly consider joining. I am still not in a stable enough living
> environment nor with any ADSL internet access, so I am still not in a
> position to set up an email server myself - but I am confident that
> this situation will change within about 1 year.
>
> Best regards,
> Zen
>
> PS, if anyone wants to post this email publicly, I certainly consent
> to you doing so.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:22 +0000
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
> To: [email protected]
>
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>      [email protected]
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
> server for the recipient domain cpunks.org by mail.jfet.org.
> [209.141.47.85].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>... User unknown
>
>
> ----- Original message -----
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>         h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
>          :from:to:content-type;
>         bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=;
>         b=OryopE3gJFsd/caCZuD8w1+IDk09WC0poE5hGpLdKz0PcleP2Fb4gISlOFiDMoA3yI
>          ATBy5Fycqg7yclQpt20kzkfZlrCxBjW/ZycH5NHzx6y95XCziQqg+axWtPEmv0KKFC45
>          Js6Y+Ixg60h2h5kw40efPheUILIf4Jo1c3oT1gjR2zAK1NoIWKVbsT/j71vFHRioAcyh
>          mSvEmJwCAeAbgrvB6sOm1RLRavRK+kf8smc1r9XrVYfhmc5AW9ImVgBfuW/NFVu3dC/G
>          FfpvhSbiEqnubkZO4SA7lv2L6NvVzSCUQEp18lcOtvsFQNWJ9Ynb9rKWuiwAyHkukLO0
>          R9oA==
> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>         d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
>         h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
>          :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
>         bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=;
>         b=m0iSFBE5X6LXASFuLy3LtbH87fh29RwudGRyAY+fCs5Zf9ycQjszLti6G2v/ZyLYs4
>          dzz5xfGGdRxQ9nP8BwKUStgkKEx3+sDeAxhGEGaXTV31nkJCkkM/zU6S58Q9BFqnuglv
>          qxMmQ9b0t6y6HYV6KFbzbExNm1eZGyhUATvmQuJin4xSqMccTg5yCmaFMZCWNVQvi97o
>          fkvjLhNdXGlFa7LZF64+bSZo3DaQ3A4Lie5PzMIHwJ45fiYGmEQ9k19FA3coKXLgBbJt
>          iYP1ru7+NgHxOj3kYN4b1c5e7Mk0XL1YMtpXXOu/FGPAnnHrwF9cQdx02cHBxcKK9AEh
>          1hMQ==
> X-Gm-Message-State:
> AG10YOQkeCLfQTlTygaAo2pvfPPTrKtT4dHj+741KUByO3hji+2FOcqAJ1QD4HYl9thETnU47zL4LNVBBwIieg==
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Received: by 10.140.93.166 with SMTP id
> d35mr58532521qge.29.1456439895793; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800 (PST)
> Sender: [email protected]
> Received: by 10.55.64.68 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800
> (PST) In-Reply-To:
> <CAOsGNSQG=0z3uT0WaTWQvK8th3v2B6p3fd9u7+6ML_Txhib_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
> References:
> <CAOsGNSQG=0z3uT0WaTWQvK8th3v2B6p3fd9u7+6ML_Txhib_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:15 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth:
> CnxMVt6WvC7DvbEQhsq0PMLZarg Message-ID:
> <CAOsGNSQRsHDjaBqo_5b1K8jPknD2yN6LR1A6ruHoKs7N44r=rA@mail.gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: A sane platform for president - what is your fundamentals
> for Eben Moglen? From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> To:
> [email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I've had an offlist comment that the following is a great start, so
> I'll try sending it again. Good luck little email...
>
>
> On 2/25/16, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So Eben is going to run for president.
> >
> > Let's make his job easy - write a first draft of his platform.
> >
> > There is the detailed version, for the geeks 'round these parts, and
> > the simple version, for the footy tribe.
> >
> > 0. Constitutional basis - executive orders affirming each and every
> > (??) clause of the Constitution of the United States of America.
> >
> > 1. Eliminate all non-court ordered (by a human judge, and with no
> > order covering more than two target individuals at a time) monitoring
> > (monitoring of all forms).
> >
> > 2. Eliminate the CIA. Eliminate Machiavellian military "exploration"
> > and all state-sponsored and any other coups and regime changes.
> >
> > 3. ???
> >