[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cpunks censorship?




Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 23:01:59 +0000
From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]>
To: jim bell <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected] Cc: [email protected], Steve Kinney
<[email protected]> Subject: from Zenaan - was Fwd: Delivery Status
Notification (Failure)


OK, new threads by me are definitely getting rejected, and
instantaneously too...

Due to a separate rejection, I take it that cross-posting has also
been banned for my email address.

I will not do any run around of creating (or using) an alternate email
address especially for cp@.
That's just an arms race and as I've always said:
- it has been and remains my intention to respect the intentions of
the founders/ creators of this mailing list

So whoever is running/ administrating this list has decided they want
to clip my wings. In principle that's fair enough, BUT:

- no one ever emailed me offlist or onlist saying that they are an
administrator of the list and that they wanted me to post less, or to
meet some other conditions
- such behaviour is cowardly, like a stab in the back
- such behaviour provides no opportunity for me to respect the
administrator(s) of the list - since they never owned up to being an
administrator, and never admitted to me their requirements about
posting less or in some other way, they are being cowardly and
providing no opportunity to me, to meet their requirements
- I do not accept cowardly behaviour from list administrators
- I thought cp@ was not a list of cowards, or for cowards

I am not interested in participating in half a mailing list (one where
I can only receive emails and reply to other people, but not post new
threads and not cross-post).

I am not interested in participating in a mailing list where temporary
(or permanent) restrictions are put in place without notice to the
person being restricted. I will not accept such cowardly behaviour.

SO, short of the cypherpunks list administrator(s) apologising to me
for their cowardliness, and reinstating my posting privileges for my
primary email address, and stating clearly their requirements for
posting to the list, and doing this publicly on the list so other
people know the requirements for posting to the list, then I shall
remove myself from this so-called "community" and find some other
place where who I am is respected, and where cowards are told to grow
the fuck up! Some place where children are not pretending they're
adults with their cowardly behaviour.

Alex, Juan, Jim, coderman and Steve, in one way or another you have
eached gained my respect. Thank you each for being who you are. If any
of you have a suggestion for an alternate mailing list, I would
certainly consider joining. I am still not in a stable enough living
environment nor with any ADSL internet access, so I am still not in a
position to set up an email server myself - but I am confident that
this situation will change within about 1 year.

Best regards,
Zen

PS, if anyone wants to post this email publicly, I certainly consent
to you doing so.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:22 +0000
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: [email protected]

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     [email protected]

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
server for the recipient domain cpunks.org by mail.jfet.org.
[209.141.47.85].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.1.1 <[email protected]>... User unknown


----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=;
        b=OryopE3gJFsd/caCZuD8w1+IDk09WC0poE5hGpLdKz0PcleP2Fb4gISlOFiDMoA3yI
         ATBy5Fycqg7yclQpt20kzkfZlrCxBjW/ZycH5NHzx6y95XCziQqg+axWtPEmv0KKFC45
         Js6Y+Ixg60h2h5kw40efPheUILIf4Jo1c3oT1gjR2zAK1NoIWKVbsT/j71vFHRioAcyh
         mSvEmJwCAeAbgrvB6sOm1RLRavRK+kf8smc1r9XrVYfhmc5AW9ImVgBfuW/NFVu3dC/G
         FfpvhSbiEqnubkZO4SA7lv2L6NvVzSCUQEp18lcOtvsFQNWJ9Ynb9rKWuiwAyHkukLO0
         R9oA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=HTwElgxrr/XkjYUfGVqhcjP320J6MHEbke6eOismL/I=;
        b=m0iSFBE5X6LXASFuLy3LtbH87fh29RwudGRyAY+fCs5Zf9ycQjszLti6G2v/ZyLYs4
         dzz5xfGGdRxQ9nP8BwKUStgkKEx3+sDeAxhGEGaXTV31nkJCkkM/zU6S58Q9BFqnuglv
         qxMmQ9b0t6y6HYV6KFbzbExNm1eZGyhUATvmQuJin4xSqMccTg5yCmaFMZCWNVQvi97o
         fkvjLhNdXGlFa7LZF64+bSZo3DaQ3A4Lie5PzMIHwJ45fiYGmEQ9k19FA3coKXLgBbJt
         iYP1ru7+NgHxOj3kYN4b1c5e7Mk0XL1YMtpXXOu/FGPAnnHrwF9cQdx02cHBxcKK9AEh
         1hMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:
AG10YOQkeCLfQTlTygaAo2pvfPPTrKtT4dHj+741KUByO3hji+2FOcqAJ1QD4HYl9thETnU47zL4LNVBBwIieg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.93.166 with SMTP id
d35mr58532521qge.29.1456439895793; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Sender: [email protected]
Received: by 10.55.64.68 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:38:15 -0800
(PST) In-Reply-To:
<CAOsGNSQG=0z3uT0WaTWQvK8th3v2B6p3fd9u7+6ML_Txhib_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
<CAOsGNSQG=0z3uT0WaTWQvK8th3v2B6p3fd9u7+6ML_Txhib_OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:38:15 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth:
CnxMVt6WvC7DvbEQhsq0PMLZarg Message-ID:
<CAOsGNSQRsHDjaBqo_5b1K8jPknD2yN6LR1A6ruHoKs7N44r=rA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A sane platform for president - what is your fundamentals
for Eben Moglen? From: Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> To:
[email protected] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I've had an offlist comment that the following is a great start, so
I'll try sending it again. Good luck little email...


On 2/25/16, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
> So Eben is going to run for president.
>
> Let's make his job easy - write a first draft of his platform.
>
> There is the detailed version, for the geeks 'round these parts, and
> the simple version, for the footy tribe.
>
> 0. Constitutional basis - executive orders affirming each and every
> (??) clause of the Constitution of the United States of America.
>
> 1. Eliminate all non-court ordered (by a human judge, and with no
> order covering more than two target individuals at a time) monitoring
> (monitoring of all forms).
>
> 2. Eliminate the CIA. Eliminate Machiavellian military "exploration"
> and all state-sponsored and any other coups and regime changes.
>
> 3. ???
>