[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[qubes-users] First Mention of Qubes in US Court Documents



----- Forwarded message from Andrew <[email protected]> -----

Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:26:18 +0100
From: Andrew <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [qubes-users] First Mention of Qubes in US Court Documents
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

Just FYI, this is the first mention I've seen of Qubes in documents
filed in any US court:
http://cryptome.org/2014/12/peck-roark-affidavit.pdf (page 7; note
that to the best of my knowledge, the context is entirely
hypothetical).

Affidavit filed in support of this motion:
http://cryptome.org/2014/11/roark-087.pdf.

This case is likely familiar to many, but those who have not heard of
it are likely to find its history very interesting.  The docket is
partially available here:
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/oregon/ordce/6:2012cv01354/108333 --
those with PACER accounts are encouraged to use their $15 free credit
to upload these public-domain documents with RECAP
(https://www.recapthelaw.org/) so all may enjoy their right to public
access.

Andrew

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/547DBDFA.3000206%40riseup.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

----- End forwarded message -----