[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cryptography] The Compromised Internet

To: [email protected]
Subject: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:12:16 -0400
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAC7JQK3M-E5GA_NvLzfUakaeD3oxeszfRSof+6E6jNAJLJ5uuw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti28JN08zWY+aNtOhFUVPQt_=yjkU5a8qW5+6RVXB7U9hSw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 9/25/13, Greg Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> Even under the much-relaxed export laws of the US, deriving spreading
> information cryptographically is a prohibited export. Which isn't to say it
> is not a good idea.

The US only applies to itself. Further, over the air, it's noise, the crypto
is undetectable and unprovable. And it's (guerilla) software, not physical
commercial product. Nor is this the old 'FCC says you can't encrypt
ham bands' argument/tech.

References:
- The Unbreakable Cipher
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Next by Date: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Previous by thread: Fwd: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Next by thread: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread