Fwd: Re: Pyrocat HD & Bergger BPF 200

From: Raven Weiss ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 11/04/05-10:35:54 AM Z
Message-id: <20051104163554.94885.qmail@web33409.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hello Eric,
My last post should have read:
2:2:100 PyroCat HD for 10 minutes at 70 degrees in a Jobo - for Bergger
as per Sandy King's past suggestion to me.
While reading your question, I was looking at my notes for a film development experiment where I used 3:2:100 PyroCat HD, but I can't remember what I was trying to learn from it.

Raven Weiss <ravenweiss@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 16:08:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Raven Weiss <ravenweiss@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Pyrocat HD & Bergger BPF 200
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

Hello Eric,
I use 3:2:100 PyroCat HD for 10 minutes at 70 degrees in a Jobo - for Bergger
I hope that helps.

Eric Nelson <emanmb@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm using the data at the Unblinking Eye site data as
a starting point for testing Pyrocat HD and various
films here.

I was wondering if there was a misprint there for
Bergger BPF 200 and I was also wondering what other
folks' times/ratios are for Bergger BPF 200.

On the site on page

for Bergger 200, it calls for a ratio of 2:2:10 for
UV, (in my case platinum/palladium) where most other
ratios listed for other films are 2:2:100. That "0"
makes a big difference!

Any help appreciated.


Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page!
Received on Fri Nov 4 10:36:42 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/01/05-02:04:49 PM Z CST