Re: Author frustration.

From: Judy Seigel ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 01/15/05-11:37:29 PM Z
Message-id: <>

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Jim Strain wrote:

> Judy: I was on the list in the early days and do remember. With any luck,
> we're getting better. On your other point, Matt or Martha, but for her fame,
> I do not believe she would be in jail. Too bad when her "crime" is lying
> about something that turned out not to be criminal. Jim

Well, AFAIK sex isn't criminal either, but Clinton got impeached for lying
about it. Which is to say "crime" is often in the eye of the beholder and
in the eye of these beholders, Martha is/was an Uppity Woman. A lotta
famous people, especially in government positions, tell worse lies, but
being of the male persuasion get away with a tap on the wrist. (Most
recently the failed nominee for homeland security comes to mind, but more
get off than not.)

PS. Thanks for remembering the good old-bad old days !

Received on Sat Jan 15 23:37:36 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:08 AM Z CST