Re: Camera Arts Article & PDN

From: Judy Seigel ^lt;jseigel@panix.com>
Date: 01/14/05-01:18:15 AM Z
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.61.0501140212580.29095@panix2.panix.com>

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, SteveS wrote:
> ... Judy Seigel
> will attest to the fact that my writing has, at times some serious flaws.

Actually Steve, you're so much improved that I insist on some of the
credit -- for calling attention to the problem. In fact I sometimes think
it's not the same person... So either you're not the same person or you've
discovered the secret to human perfectability... (Note that I didn't say
perfection, but ... perfectability is also, as Martha is reputed to have
said, a good thing.)

Judy

> Toward the end of this diatribe with Simmons, I copied a Steinbeck passage,
> changed the names and noun objects; but it was reacted to by Simmons with
> such a barrage of negative critizisms. Even his writers (he sometimes pays
> writers to appear on site to verify and clarify, write articles) who appeared
> to finalize this one story confided to me how he uses this [email] writing
> example of awful stuff.
>
> So, you're dealing with a guy who hates Nobel Laurate writing . . . what else
> can be said. The guy is one person who works at a desk with papers falling
> off on the floor, I have been told. He's a dedicated person, dedicated to
> view camera photography, and I enjoy reading most of the stuff that gets into
> the magazine. Lots of luck, if you retain your own sense of character, deal
> with the excentrics.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Lovenguth"
> <chris@chrisportfolio.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Camera Arts Article & PDN
>
>
>> Judy....
>>
>> Here is their contact. I just found out that they are splitting up Camera
>> Arts and View Camera in to two different entities. Maybe that's why I
>> haven't been able to get anybody over at View Camera about payment for the
>> article I wrote for them....ah learned the hard way not having a formal
>> contract first before giving them materials ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> CameraArts
>> P.O. Box 3941
>> Albuquerque, NM 87190
>> Shipping Address:
>> 2403 San Mateo Blvd., NE, S-3
>> Albuquerque, NM 87110
>> T: (505) 881-2717 . F: (505) 212-0330
>> info@cameraarts.com . Office Hours: Monday-Friday 9am-4pm Mountain Time
>>
>> -Chris
>> www.christopherlovenguth.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Judy Seigel [mailto:jseigel@panix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:07 AM
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>> Subject: Re: Camera Arts Article & PDN
>>
>> Mark that's exactly what I want to do -- but what's their phone number:
>> It's not in the Manhattan phone book !
>>
>> my system is going down it says in 5 seconds... later,
>>
>> Judy
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 Ender100@aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Judy,
>>>
>>> I don't know if it is brilliant or not, but here is a brilliant
>>> suggestion...call Camera Arts Magazine and they will send you the magazine
>> for $2.00 plus
>>> shipping. It's like ordering a back issue even though it is the current
>>> issue....and actually cheaper than buying it at the store.
>>>
>>> Well, ok...it's a great article hehehehehehe
>>>
>>> By the way, I'm in Clearwater, Florida ..and giving a talk tomorrow night
>> on
>>> Precision Digital Negatives to the Large Format Group here at the
>> invitation
>>> of Joe Tomaskovsky‚?"I think the meeting is in Largo, but trusting Jane to
>> guide
>>> me there. If anyone is in the neighborhood and would like to attend, let
>> me
>>> know and I will try to email info.
>>>
>>> Mark Nelson
>>> www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com
>>>
>>> In a message dated 1/12/05 10:28:45 PM, n23n@comcast.net writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> And speaking of "the literature' -- I tried to get the Camera Arts
>>>>> magazine with Mark's brilliant article about digital negatives. I even
>>>>> went-- if you could BELIEVE -- above 14th Street.¬ Nobody had Camera
>> Arts,
>>>>> in fact one magazine store (the one in Grand Central that has
>> EVERYTHING)
>>>>> explained that it doesn't distribute except by subscription, though
>>>>> somehow that doesn't seem likely.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Fri Jan 14 01:18:21 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:07 AM Z CST