Re: 55 minute download

From: Jack Fulton ^lt;>
Date: 09/01/04-09:16:13 PM Z
Message-id: <>

Well, by golly, it is about the same here. Maybe 2 seconds, if that.
However, my web access costs 40 something dollars per month.
I need it being an educator but also fully understand those who either
do not have fast access.
My thinking is to send but one image if any AND make sure it is in the
50-70 KB range.

On Sep 1, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Sandy King wrote:

With regard to Ryuji's comments about the "unsubscribe" requests, I
don't really believe he is that naive.

But what is the big deal about the attachments? They downloaded on my
system in less than two seconds. If your ISP requires 5 - 55 minutes it
might be time to consider changing provider and joining the rest of us
in the 21st century. Just a thought.


> From: Katharine Thayer <>
> Subject: Re: 55 minute download
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 10:47:49 +0000
>> Heck, why would they see the instructions not to send attachments
>> any more than they see the instructions about how to unsubscribe?
> For some reason I always thought that those deliberately
> misdirected/misformatted unsubscribe requests are signals that tell
> "we've had this thread for long enough."
> --
> Ryuji Suzuki
> "You have to realize that junk is not the problem in and of itself.
> Junk is the symptom, not the problem."
> (Bob Dylan 1971; source: No Direction Home by Robert Shelton)
Received on Wed Sep 1 21:16:26 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 10/01/04-09:17:54 AM Z CST