RE: Epson 2200 & Digital Negatives

From: Loris Medici ^lt;>
Date: 06/02/04-02:37:23 AM Z
Message-id: <004201c4487c$d4dd8b50$ce02500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

jack says " doesn't sound like such a good deal ..."

IF you're using a 2200 (this is what I gather from comments by various
users - I yet have to make a trial myself on a friend's 2200)... BUT,
I'm using a 1160 with Conetech inks and UCF simply "rocks" with these
inks and Pictorico "sucks" with the same inks - I mean when compared to
UCF, not that I can't print with Pictorico negatives; but they just are
much more sensitive to abrasion.

Christina, which printer were you using to print diginegs on UCF?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jack reisland []
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:12 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Epson 2200 & Digital Negatives
> Mike Klemmer wrote:
> > I meant that the UCF filled a much needed gap for me price wise -
> > being much more affordable than the Pictorico.
> Hmmm... based on your reports, it doesn't sound like such a
> good deal to me.
Received on Wed Jun 2 02:32:48 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 07/02/04-09:40:13 AM Z CST