Re: Argyrotype

From: [email protected]
Date: 01/08/04-12:20:57 AM Z
Message-id: <30.4d9806ee.2d2e50c9@aol.com>

Sandy,

Maybe they should have called it AAAAAAARRRGGGHHHHyrotype!

Mark Nelson
In a message dated 1/7/04 11:32:53 PM, sanking@clemson.edu writes:

> Well, I am certainly not surprised that someone has had trouble with
> argyrotype. I tried this process with literally dozens of papers and
> I never got anything close to decent Dmax with any of them. And if
> the terribly expensive Buxton is the only paper in the world that
> works decently with the process one would be much better off in terms
> of expense to just make palladiums or platinums.
>
> And besides, I can never spell the process correctly unless someone
> leads me into it and I can cut and paste from their message, as I
> have done here!!
>
> Sandy King
>
>
Received on Thu Jan 8 00:21:17 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:49:58 AM Z CST