Re: Digital Negatives/Piezography

From: Christina Z. Anderson ^lt;>
Date: 02/13/04-08:40:31 AM Z
Message-id: <00a401c3f23f$7ad1ff30$6101a8c0@your6bvpxyztoq>

Kinda like PhotoVision Magazine; a while back on the list I mentioned that
an article of mine on mordancage was coming out in the Jan/Feb issue of
PhotoVision. Well, I got a letter a couple weeks ago saying the magazine
ceased publication with the Nov/Dec issue. Oh well, at least I have a copy
of the layout of the article as it was meant to go to press...

I think the digital field has so much coming and going, and I know
PhotoVision struggled between the two.

Not that this hasn't been the norm for the photographic field. In research
thru the late 1800's a new process would be the rage, businesses would rise
up to cash in on its commercial possibilities, and then another process
would supplant it 10 years later.
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: Digital Negatives/Piezography

> An interesting note regarding Piezography that appeared on the Large
> Printer List:
> First, to understand the relationship between InkJetMall and Cone
> Editions, read the first paragraph at:
> Then see case #04-10148 at:
> This is a Chapter 11 filing (which allows for
> "reorganization")
> Mark Nelson
Received on Fri Feb 13 08:41:50 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 03/02/04-11:35:08 AM Z CST