[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Can I tell my Linksys router to always serve the same I P address?

I have a BEFVP41 and a non VPN router before.

The DHCP does lack some features that you would get off a *NIX box or 
even a windows server.  But we are talking about windows server here.   
One of them, is that you will not always get the same LAN IP for a 
machine.  On BEFVP41 I have you can set the lease time though and the 
number of clients.  Yes, I had this idea that I could just limit the 
DHCP range to 3 machines and then that would take care of the problem.  
No, that didn't work.   but some weird network problems after about a 
week with this setup.   Now, I once read that Windows will assume that 
it will get the same IP address when it is rebooting or coming of 
standby.  So it makes for some great network issues when someone leaves 
for a day and puts their machine in standby.  They come back and you 
have a IP conflict. 

Back to the BEFVP41.   Great router for lite SOHO work and VPNs.  But 
you have to make sure you setup the VPN right the first time. I have had 
some problems switching back and forth on the manual and auto IKE settings.

Jim Lynch wrote:

>Mills, John M. wrote:
>>Jim -
>>I have a couple of simple LinkSys routers and a brand-X ('Airlink'), and all
>>work the same way: if a machine is to have a specific IP, I must set up its
>>configuration and its IP must lie in a range defined by the router.
>>Setup includes identifying nameservers' IPs (on the WAN - I use my ISP's
>>DNS), but those are the same IPs I gave the router got when I set _it_ up:
>>it's manual, but I have the information.
>>Machines to which ports are forwarded must have static IPs on the LAN (says
>>the manual).
>>My Linux and Win boxen (and an anecdotal sample of other toys - latest a
>>LinkSys VoIP modem) generally _request_ that DHCP re-serve them the last IP
>>address they had, and these seem to be honored where they don't conflict
>>with my LAN IP range and other active machines. I suppose there is no
>>guarantee of this behavior. 
>>I haven't seen any expiry on those assignements.
>>I know this doesn't meet all your criteria, but it seems to achieve what you
>>- Mills
>I noticed the same behavior here, but I didn't know if I could rely on 
>it or not.  The manual for this version of the box is quite useless for 
>doing anything other than installing it.  It doesn't address most of the 
>options available.  I haven't seen a way to set the expiration time 
>anywhere either.
>I've got a spare system or two.  I may have to turn one of them into a 
>Ale mailing list
>Ale at ale.org