[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] OT: underclocking?
- Subject: [ale] OT: underclocking?
- From: jkinney at localnetsolutions.com (James P. Kinney III)
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:00:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 14:10 -0600, Joe Knapka wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> My FC3 machine quit booting the other day -- NOTHING happens
> when power is applied, except that the fans spin up. I tried
> booting the bare board with just video and RAM, and got the
> same behavior. So I'm thinking that either the Mmotherboard or
> the CPU is shot, but I don't know which.
> The box was a 1.2GHz Socket 370 Celeron on a Gigabyte GX-6VTXE
> mobo, running a 100MHz FSB. I do have another Socket 370 MB here,
> a Compaq Prosignia, but it only supports chips up to 500MHz and
> a 66MHz FSB. Can I reasonably expect that, if my 1.2GHz chip is
> OK, it would work in the slower MB?
Underclocking is almost always OK. You won't damage the CPU by running
it at a lower clockspeed.
HOWEVER!!! Most newer CPU' use a lower voltage than most older boards
provide. That _will_ trash the CPU. You will need to underclock the CPU
voltage to get it down to what the new CPU will run on.
> -- Joe Knapka
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \ one Linux user /
Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
<jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part