[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Atapi cdrecord?

And as an addendum to this I also personally think that everything
that supports a SCSI command set (or subset thereof) should show
up as a SCSI device, regardless of what kind of physical interface
it has.  It makes perfect sense to me that USB storage devices show 
up as SCSI devices, and that Firewire storage devices show up as
SCSI devices, so why the heck should IDE storage devices not show
up as SCSI devices?  They implement the command set, so why not
make it easier on ourselves and have everything be SCSI?


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Panetta <ahuitzot at mindspring.com>
Sent: Jan 11, 2004 4:03 PM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
Subject: Re: [ale] Atapi cdrecord?

Read this:


And decide for yourself.

Personally I have no problems with the ide-scsi "fun"...


-----Original Message-----
From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net>
Sent: Jan 11, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
Subject: [ale] Atapi cdrecord?

Ok, I remember a conversation about burning and the ide-scsi fun.  I
have a Knoppix CD I want to to burn, a Sony IDE cdrom on HCD and a pile
of blanks.  How do you burn using the ATAPI/IDE interface instead of the
ide-scsi fun?  Yeah, I'm just curious if it's easier.

Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Life is not a destination, it's a journey.
  Microsoft produces 15 car pileups on the highway.
    Don't stop traffic to stand and gawk at the tragedy.

Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org