[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
- Subject: pTLA request for MICROSOFT - review closes 2 January 2002
- From: [email protected] (Mike Knell)
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:11:24 +0000
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2001 04:17:26 EST." <[email protected]>
> > > MICROSOFT has requested a pTLA allocation. The open review period for thi
> > > will close 2 January 2002. Please send your comments to me or the list.
> The very least that 6bone can do is have Microsoft agree to such terms in
> writing. As a NetBSD developer, I do not want to see our work become
> irrelevant should Microsoft start making incompatible protocols.
Microsoft have had a presence on the 6bone for a long time, and I fail to
see (not that, I must confess, I'm that active in v6 stuff at the moment
after moving jobs) how granting them a block of address space should somehow
be seen as giving Microsoft carte blanche to "develop incompatible protocols".
Can we try and be realistic here?
This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may
be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must not copy or show
them to anyone, nor should you take any action based on them, other than to
notify the error by replying to the sender.