[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


At 04:28 PM 5/16/97 -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>>I would assume the multiprotocol BGP drafts of Bates, Chandra et al.
>OK that would be:
>I don't care either way... But if it is what we are doing I know it
>would be good for all to implement it if possible for a potential UNH
>IPv6 interoperability event to test it out in late July.
This is not what WE are doing. This is what one vendor is doing and this
was not approved in the IDR WG.  As matter of fact it was decided to go
with BGP5 albeit it was not clear what features will be incorporated in the
next version of bgp.