[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
new addressing plan
>>>>> "Dimitry" == Dimitry Haskin <[email protected]> writes:
Dimitry> At 09:34 AM 6/10/97 -0700, Pedro Marques wrote:
>> Is this the general opinion ?
>> Personaly i believe our present aproach is superior since it
>> does not require any registry...
Dimitry> It is not that we can't get away without registry at
Dimitry> 6bone for some time.
To be more specific, we don't need, with an AS based scheme, to have
address delegation being made by a registry. A registry is useful and
the RIPE registry as been a great aid to everyone.
Dimitry> It is that we need to start testing
Dimitry> addressing concepts to their full extend asap.
I see no advantage in having a registry assigned prefix and a prefix build
from a AS #... the addressing concept is exactly the same.
Dimitry> This includes registry operations and address delegation which
Dimitry> are important components in overall scheme.
At the moment i believe that requiring address delegation will only make
things harder for people to get into the 6bone... things are hard enought
as it is for most people.
Dimitry> The fact
Dimitry> that there is no operational v6 registry has become
Dimitry> detrimental to the v6 deployment effort
I think it is a plus...
Dimitry> since it
Dimitry> contributes to the perception that v6 lacks even basic
Dimitry> deployment logistics.
A 6bone registry would not be able to delegate non testing allocation
addresses. Also i do believe that this is not a real technical problem
but incorrect perception by some people...