[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)
- Subject: more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)
- From: [email protected] (Quaizar Vohra)
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 17:20:00 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]> from "Ran Atkinson" at Jul 31, 96 02:11:12 pm
> Your tunnel endpoint can contain a "default" (actually 5f00::/8)
>route pointing at NRL, a static route for DEC, a static route
>for Bay, and any routes needed with UNH. That is entirely
>sufficient to work properly with the 6bone and seems entirely
>managable by hand.
> So I don't see the need for any changes to the 1897 specification.
That's what I am currently doing and it works, but as Alain pointed
out that we don't want a star topology. I agree fully with Alain's
idea which has always been my chant, i.e. do heirachial routing.