[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)
- Subject: more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)
- From: [email protected] (Ran Atkinson)
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 14:11:12 PDT
- In-reply-to: [email protected] (Quaizar Vohra) "Re: more tunnels and what to do next (fwd)" (Jul 31, 4:32pm)
Your tunnel endpoint can contain a "default" (actually 5f00::/8)
route pointing at NRL, a static route for DEC, a static route
for Bay, and any routes needed with UNH. That is entirely
sufficient to work properly with the 6bone and seems entirely
managable by hand.
So I don't see the need for any changes to the 1897 specification.