[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[safnog] OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
On 1/Sep/16 16:06, Dany Hearne wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> From my experience working with service providers many engineers seem
> more comfortable with OSPF, whether this is due to experience or just
> as a result of training.
> I love both protocols but as Johnny said - it is probably best to use
> the one your engineering team understands best.
We use OSPF on Anycast servers (DNS, TACACS+, NTP, e.t.c.), because
IS-IS implementation in Quagga/Zebra is very poor. But then we inject
that into IS-IS and it's all good.
For the rest of the backbone, IS-IS all the way.
But to be fair, use what you're happy with.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...