[nanog] BGP routes by country

• Subject: [nanog] BGP routes by country
• From: savage at savage.za.org (Chris Knipe)
• Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 22:48:10 +0200
• In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaaeuqeg5srB0cRf-h+yjOBcMt-7Dgn6zTY_djTO+DdMHw@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaaeuqeg5srB0cRf-h+yjOBcMt-7Dgn6zTY_djTO+DdMHw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:53 PM Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Maybe asking from the get-go:
>   "What are you trying to do?"
>
> because the question asked is fraught with peril and disaster...
>

Why?  When you have a serious problem with a specific ASN, it's not
unreasonable to drop traffic to that entire ASN.

When you have a serious problem predominantly originating from a certain
country, why is it unreasonable to drop traffic to that entire country?

Just because I own an ASN and participate in the world of BGP, doesn't mean
I *must* accept everyone's traffic from all over the world.  My network, my
rules(1)

(1) my as in the ASN whom choose to drop prefixes for an entire ASN and/or
country.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190926/4340a744/attachment.html>

• Follow-Ups:
  • [nanog] BGP routes by country
    • From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

• References:
  • [nanog] BGP routes by country
    • From: michel.py at tsisemi.com (Michel Py)
  • [nanog] BGP routes by country
    • From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

• Prev by Date: [nanog] BGP routes by country
• Next by Date: [nanog] BGP routes by country
• Previous by thread: [nanog] BGP routes by country
• Next by thread: [nanog] BGP routes by country
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread