IPAM recommendations

• Subject: IPAM recommendations
• From: eric.kuhnke at gmail.com (Eric Kuhnke)
• Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 12:00:04 -0700
• In-reply-to: <CA[email protected]>
• References: <CA[email protected]>

Many others have already recommended these, but I suggest installing test
VMs of both phpipam and nipap and seeing which works best for your use
case.

NIPAP has fairly extensive tools supporting automation for provisioning.
phpipam has a few additional functions on top of only ip address
management, it also appears to have been designed for a use case where
people are running geographically spread out layer 2 services and keeping
track of which vlan belongs to which customer.




On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:36 AM Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:

> Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open source, API is a plus
> (almost must, almost..). 40-50K IPs to be managed.
>
> thanks in advance.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190905/a7290ad0/attachment.html>

• References:
  • IPAM recommendations
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)

• Prev by Date: rr.level3.net on autopilot?
• Next by Date: Spam due to new ARIN allocation
• Previous by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Next by thread: IPAM recommendations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread