[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
My .sig (Was Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?)
- Subject: My .sig (Was Re: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?)
- From: tj at pcguys.us (TJ Trout)
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:56:29 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Your sig is fine, anyone who says otherwise needs to obtain gainful
employment to occupy more free time
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:36 PM James R Cutler <james.cutler at consultant.com>
wrote:
> --- amitchell at isipp.com wrote:
> From: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell at isipp.com>
>
> [This .sig space open to suggestions.]
>
> Just to continue this clearly trivial discussion:
>
> I enjoy your signature. It always leaves no question regarding the posting
> identity.
>
> James R. Cutler
> James.cutler at consultant.com
> GPG keys: hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190426/bc97c2ef/attachment.html>