Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?

• Subject: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
• Date: 26 Apr 2019 21:00:41 -0400
• In-reply-to: <44a32613-a255-44eb-a094-cee68b6d088a@Spark>

In article <44a32613-a255-44eb-a094-cee68b6d088a at Spark> you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>particularly "interesting" when someone downloads CP (or, as it now seems to be called, CSAM) using their
>ipaddr and causes them to become a Person of Interest.

I was thinking the same thing, that'll do it.  Or maybe videos showing
how to behead members of religious or cultural groups against whom
someone holds a grudge.

• References:
  • Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
    • From: mis at seiden.com (Mark Seiden)

• Prev by Date: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation (fwd)
• Next by Date: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Previous by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Next by thread: Packetstream - how does this not violate just about every provider's ToS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread