[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation (fwd)
- Subject: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation (fwd)
- From: nanog-post at rsuc.gweep.net (Joe Provo)
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:47:20 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]om>
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:41:18AM -0500, Matt Harris wrote:
> Can you (or someone else on the list, perhaps even someone who was involved
> in voting this down) provide some more details as to why it was rejected?
> What were the arguments in favor of rejecting the proposal? This seems
> like an interesting idea to me, and one that I can't immediately come up
> with any arguments against from my own perspective. There's probably some
> room for discussing and tuning specifics, but ultimately the concept seems
> reasonable to me. What am I missing here?
Speaking solely for myself, it would be reasonable to start
any discussion based upon the on-record rationales for its
rejection. As such I would direct interested parties to the
Draft Advisory Council Meeting minutes from April 10
and most specifically on that page
"16. ARIN-Prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation"
Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling