DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct

• Subject: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
• From: nick at nanocat.net (Nick Morrison)
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 22:31:06 +0200
• In-reply-to: <CAJsNY[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAJsNY[email protected]>

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:09, Alfie Pates <alfie at fdx.services> wrote:

> I feel this comes off as poking fun at trans people, women, and earnest
> attempts to combat what are actual problems in our industry, more than it
> pokes fun at the industry itself which is what a good April Fool should do
> - this feels more like laughing at "outsiders" more than laughing at
> ourselves.
>
> I think this is pretty tone-deaf, in my opinion.
>

Completely agree, Alfie.

(And hi, nanog, I'm Nick. Do we do introduction rounds here?)

Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20190404/3bcc3485/attachment.html>

• Follow-Ups:
  • DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
    • From: me at shawnritchie.com (Shawn Ritchie)

• References:
  • DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
    • From: markjr at easydns.com (Mark E. Jeftovic)
  • DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
    • From: alfie at fdx.services (Alfie Pates)

• Prev by Date: SFP supplier in Europe?
• Next by Date: SFP supplier in Europe?
• Previous by thread: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
• Next by thread: DNS Qtypes and class values are a social construct
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread