[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)

Do note that ping response times are not a good indicator of DNS
performance.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 3:48 AM Michael Bullut <main at kipsang.com> wrote:

> Greetings Team,
>
> Has anyone deployed the aforementioned in your individual networks? A
> quick test suggests it is quite fast compared with Google's D.N.S.
> resolvers:
>
> *C:\Users\bullutm>ping 1.1.1.1*
>
> *Pinging 1.1.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:*
> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=61*
> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=61*
> *Reply from 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=61*
>
> *Ping statistics for 1.1.1.1 <http://1.1.1.1/>:*
> *    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),*
> *Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:*
> *    Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 8ms, Average = 4ms*
>
> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>
> *-------*
>
> *C:\Users\bullutm>tracert 1.1.1.1*
>
> *Tracing route to one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
> *over a maximum of 30 hops:*
>
> *  1     4 ms     3 ms     4 ms  10.101.129.254*
> *  2     6 ms    20 ms     7 ms  10.98.0.165*
> *  3     7 ms    13 ms    15 ms  10.98.0.233*
> *  4     7 ms     5 ms     4 ms  one.one.one.one [1.1.1.1]*
>
> *Trace complete.*
>
> *C:\Users\bullutm>*
>
> Warm regards,
>
> Michael Bullut.
>
> ---
>
> *Cell:*
> *+254 723 393 114.**Skype Name:* *Michael Bullut.*
> *Twitter:*
> * @Kipsang <http://twitter.com/Kipsang/>*
> *Blog: http://www.kipsang.com/ <http://www.kipsang.com/>*
> *E-mail:* *main at kipsang.com <main at kipsang.com>*
>
> *---*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180926/27dd67f4/attachment.html>