[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

ARIN RPKI TAL deployment issues

On 26 Sep 2018, at 2:09 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com<mailto:morrowc.lists at gmail.com>> wrote:

(I'm going to regret posting this later, but...)

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:57 PM John Curran <jcurran at arin.net<mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:

The significant difference for ARIN is that we operate under a different legal regime, and as a matter of US law, it appears that we cannot rely only upon terms and conditions published in our website as evidence of informed agreement; i.e. within the US legal framework, we need a specific act of acceptance in order to have a binding agreement.

how is arin's problem here different from that which 'lets encrypt' is facing with their Cert things?

Chris -

The â??Letâ??s encryptâ?? subscriber agreement (current version 1.2, 15 Nov 2018) includes "indemnify and hold harmlessâ?? clause, and parties affirmatively agree to those terms by requesting that ISRG issue a "Letâ??s Encryptâ?? Certificate to you.

(I donâ??t know whether that process is particularly more or less onerous technically than the effort to download the ARIN TAL.)


John Curran
President and CEO

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180926/c474a9ae/attachment.html>