IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap

• Subject: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
• From: valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu (valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu)
• Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:16:59 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <BN7PR15MB24982[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 12:27:35 -0400, "Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG" said:

> Because, Apple adds a 25 ms artifical penalty to ipv4 dns resolution.
>
> https://ma.ttias.be/apple-favours-ipv6-gives-ipv4-a-25ms-penalty/

Umm.. It's 3 year old news that Apple implemented Happy Eyeballs.

And if you read, it continues on saying that both Firefox and Chrome use a 300ms
timer rather than 25ms.

The solution is, of course, to not build websites that need to hit 20 or 30 IPv4-only
tracking and affiliate and ad sites. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180623/07d288c3/attachment.sig>

• References:
  • IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
    • From: surfer at mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks)
  • IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
    • From: lee.howard at retevia.net (Lee Howard)
  • IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
    • From: lobna_gouda at hotmail.com (lobna gouda)
  • IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
    • From: jean at ddostest.me (Jean | ddostest.me)

• Prev by Date: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
• Next by Date: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
• Previous by thread: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need /24 (arin) asap
• Next by thread: Google Email Contact --- security issue
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread