[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FWIW... Re: TEST Help? TEST
- Subject: FWIW... Re: TEST Help? TEST
- From: surfer at mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 17:16:56 -0700
On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete...
----------------------------------------
Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6
faster/better proof?" thread I can't reply to.
I still can't. All I wanted to say was:
--- cb.list6 at gmail.com wrote:
From: Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com>
I hear transit is dead
https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/
--------------------------------------------
Funny that he also seems to take indirect aim at IPv6:
"In this case, then in such a collection of service
cones, is there any residual value in a globally
consistent address space? If all the traffic flows are
constrained to sit within each service cone, then the
residual addressing requirement is at best a requirement
to uniquely distinguish end points just within the scope
of the cone without any particular requirement for
network-wide uniqueness "
That seems to point to John Day's architecture; RINA:
https://www.slideshare.net/ictpristine/rina-introduction-part-i
scott