[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
- Subject: Time to add 2002::/16 to bogon filters?
- From: sfisher at cymru.com (Scott Fisher)
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:17:19 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CACWOCC_S01AvctXfk2E3r=mQgZHtaoO=N-oViVQiQQ3iVm9h0w@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC8X2hgycSz-iq43eAHtatDu8+HvZkpHoPh9RgjpRaG2PQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Youssef & all,
My team will investigate this and get back to the list on what we are
going to do.
Thanks,
Scott Fisher
Systems Engineer
Team Cymru
On 6/28/18 3:11 PM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
> Hello Job,
>
> Thank you for this feedback. I guess that NTT adopting this as a best practice will ring some bells around.
>
> Do you know if Team Cymru has updated their filters accordingly ?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
>> Le 28 juin 2018 à 20:58, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> a écrit :
>>
>> Dear alll,
>>
>> Thank you all for your input. Just a heads-up - we deployed a few days ago.
>>
>> NTT / AS 2914 now considers â??2002::/16 le 128â?? and â??192.88.99.0/24 le 32â??
>> to be bogon prefixes, and no longer accepts announcements for these
>> destinations from any EBGP neighbor.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Job
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 873 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20180705/a7b908df/attachment.sig>