[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should ISP block child pornography?
- Subject: Should ISP block child pornography?
- From: mis at seiden.com (Mark Seiden)
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 22:22:08 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
where is this list of dirty domains?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 10:08 PM Lotia, Pratik M <Pratik.Lotia at charter.com>
wrote:
> Hello all, was curious to know the communityâ??s opinion on whether an ISP
> should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation) content?
> Interpol has a â??worst-ofâ?? list which contains such domains and it wants
> ISPs to block it.
>
> On one side we want the ISP to not do any kind of censorship or inspection
> of customer traffic (customers are paying for pipes â?? not for filtered
> pipes), on the other side morals/ethics come into play. Keep in mind that
> if an ISP is blocking it would mean that it is also logging the information
> (source IP) and law agencies might be wanting access to it.
>
>
>
> Wondering if any operator is actively doing it or has ever considered
> doing it?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> With Gratitude,
>
>
>
> *Pratik Lotia*
>
>
>
> â??Information is not knowledge.â??
> The contents of this e-mail message and
> any attachments are intended solely for the
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential
> and/or legally privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this message
> or if this message has been addressed to you
> in error, please immediately alert the sender
> by reply e-mail and then delete this message
> and any attachments. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are notified that
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,
> or storage of this message or any attachment
> is strictly prohibited.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181206/632ec053/attachment.html>