Yet another Quadruple DNS?

• Subject: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
• From: nop at imap.cc (nop at imap.cc)
• Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:08:07 -0700
• In-reply-to: <CA+LTh[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <CA+LTh[email protected]>

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, at 2:18 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:

> Very disappointing to see a popular prefix being allocated/reseved for
> research then being allocated to a company without public consultation. I
> am sure APNIC community will ask APNIC Sr. management for an explanation.
> 
> This prefix , if it will be given to any business , should go thru a
> transparent bidding process OR regular APNIC allocation process
> transprently.
> 

>From what I can tell, this has not been "allocated" (probably closer to a LOA)? All contacts and maintainers on the inetnum object are still APNIC's, Cloudflare does not have free access to do whatever they want here.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Yet another Quadruple DNS?
    • From: mehmet at akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin)
  • Yet another Quadruple DNS?
    • From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)

• Next by Date: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
• Next by thread: Yet another Quadruple DNS?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread