[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack
- Subject: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 08:27:44 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <CALoKGd2V=-OYp2adoFCZjtDQNhP5ZW3jU+BmyG9EC7HDZa=1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CALoKGd2qr-Nnj-+XCJMSga_E2A33ebnX9EK2zicRKt8zvZuS=Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <188365876.2112.1482414685356.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> <CALoKGd2V=-OYp2adoFCZjtDQNhP5ZW3jU+BmyG9EC7HDZa=1Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Skepticism is of course warranted with such bold claims and little public information to back it up.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Lyamin" <la at qrator.net>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: "j j santanna" <j.j.santanna at utwente.nl>, "NANOG list" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 7:53:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack
I just reviewed our data at http://radar.qrator.net provided network list.
I am highly skeptical.
<tapping my feet neurotically>
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Mike Hammett < nanog at ics-il.net > wrote:
Let's wait and see if his stated message of being here to discuss technical matters of the vulnerability with the aforementioned carriers bears anything out. If not, don the torches.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
----- Original Message -----
From: "j j santanna" < j.j.santanna at utwente.nl >
To: jean at ddostest.me
Cc: nanog at nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 5:01:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack
I am saying!
As far as I understand you are offering DDoS attacks as a paid service, right? Some people would say that you offer DDoS for hire. What is the difference between your service and a Booter service. Only a ?validation" that your client is ?stress testing? him/herself does not make you legal. Sorry man but you can NOT claim yourself as a legal/moral acceptable stress tester if you misuse devices on the Internet, such as amplifiers, webshell, and botnets.
Although you don?t consider yourself a Booter, you are one of them!
I leave up to you the definition of stupid.
Cheers,
Jair Santanna
jairsantanna.com < http://jairsantanna.com >
On 22 Dec 2016, at 11:45, Jean | ddostest.me < http://ddostest.me > < jean at ddostest.me <mailto: jean at ddostest.me >> wrote:
I admit that I have a lot of guts.
Not sure who said that I am a booter or that I operate a booter. I fight booter since more than 5 years and who would be stupid enough to put his full name with full address to a respected network operators list? Definitely not me.
I want to help and fix things and I am not the kind of person to break things.
Jean
On 16-12-22 03:46 AM, j.j.santanna at utwente.nl <mailto: j.j.santanna at utwente.nl > wrote:
Hi Jean,
You are either naive or have a lot of guts to offer a Booter service in one of the most respected network operators list. Man, as long as you use amplifiers (third party services) or botnets your ?service? is illegal & immoral. In case you use your own infrastructure or rent a legal (cloud) infrastructure to provide your "service" it will not pay your costs. Not at least by the price that you offer your service: 0, 13, 100 bucks. Even if you have a legal/moral acceptable attack infrastructure, if you throw those big attacks that you advertise will possibly take down many others third-parties on the way.
Sometimes you folks say that (mis)use amplifiers for ?testing? purpose is not a problem because those services are open and publicly available on the Internet. Come on? if I leave my car open with the key inside it doesn?t give you the right to use my car to throw into a third party company. And if you do, it is YOUR CRIME, not mine.
I don?t need to explain why using botnets is illegal and immoral, right?
Man, it is up to you decide between cyber crime and cyber security ( https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/public-awareness-and-prevention-guides/cyber-crime-vs-cyber-security-what-will-you-choose ). Now, we are also looking to you on http://booterblacklist.com < http://booterblacklist.com/ >. Thanks!
Cheers,
Jair Santanna
On 22 Dec 2016, at 07:51, Alexander Lyamin < la at qrator.net <mailto: la at qrator.net ><mailto: la at qrator.net >> wrote:
I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between networks on the list
and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me < http://ddostest.me/ >< http://ddostest.me/ > via NANOG <
nanog at nanog.org <mailto: nanog at nanog.org ><mailto: nanog at nanog.org >> wrote:
Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules.
I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high
volume of traffic.+10Tbps
** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could
initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack.
We talk about an amplification factor x100+. This mean that a single
computer with 1 Gbps outgoing bandwidth would generate a 100 Gbps DDoS.
Imagine what a botnet could do?
The list of affected business is huge and I would like to privately
disclose the details to the Tier1 ISP as they are highly vulnerable.
XO Comm
PSINET
Level 3
Qwest
Windstream Comm
Eearthlink
MCI Comm/Verizon Buss
Comcast Cable Comm
AT&T
Sprint
I know it's Christmas time and there is no rush in disclosing this but, it
could be a nice opportunity to meditate and shed some lights on this new
DDoS threat. We could start the real work in January.
If you are curious and you operate/manage one of the network mentioned
above, please write to me at tornaddos at ddostest.me <mailto: tornaddos at ddostest.me ><mailto: tornaddos at ddostest.me > from your job email to
confirm the identity. I will then forward you the DDoS details.
Best regards
Jean St-Laurent
ddostest.me < http://ddostest.me/ >< http://ddostest.me/ >
365 boul. Sir-Wilfrid-Laurier #202
Beloeil, QC J3G 4T2
--
Alexander Lyamin
CEO | Qrator < http://qrator.net/ >* Labs*
office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522)
mob: +7-916-9086122
skype: melanor9
mailto: la at qrator.net <mailto: la at qrator.net ><mailto: la at qrator.net >
--
Alexander Lyamin
CEO | Qrator Labs
office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522)
mob: +7-916-9086122
skype: melanor9
mailto: la at qrator.net