[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- Subject: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
- From: nanog at ics-il.net (Mike Hammett)
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:23:46 -0600 (CST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
Your point has been made here many times as has mine.
There's enough upstream available on enough carriers that if there were some big upload unicorn out there waiting to be harnessed... they'd be able to do it.
All that the consumer has ever had that could benefit is P2P and offsite backup.
Intelligent Computing Solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aled Morris" <aledm at qix.co.uk>
To: "Scott Helms" <khelms at zcorum.com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 9:17:33 AM
Subject: Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
On 2 March 2015 at 14:41, Scott Helms <khelms at zcorum.com> wrote:
> We see customer usage patterns and satisfaction being statically the same
> on 25/25 and 25/8 accounts. The same is true when we look at 50/50 versus
> 50/12 accounts.
perhaps because there are no widely-deployed applications that are designed
with the expectation of reasonable upstream bandwidth. Average users
haven't got into the mindset that they can use lots of upstream (because
mainly, they can't.) Without really knowing what they could have, they're
happy with what they've got.
You've asked them if they're happy with the eggs, and in finding they were,
declared nobody wanted for chicken.