[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FIB Sizing
- Subject: FIB Sizing
- From: shopik at inblock.ru (Nikolay Shopik)
- Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:59:50 +0300
- In-reply-to: <CAPkb-7DmZbr4M=yhc14pYdrtZYeBFpX98iqqMht9DTCShP5Y=w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXwqbFs_ywFOKMJEB4iniU5Vrc9EG0qM2=gDSjEWij14Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPkb-7DmZbr4M=yhc14pYdrtZYeBFpX98iqqMht9DTCShP5Y=w@mail.gmail.com>
When de aggregation hit IPv6, with lot of /48
> On 25 ???? 2015 ?., at 14:28, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22 July 2015 at 06:51, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>
>> The IPv4 BGP table has been growing by 10% to 15% per year since CIDR.
>> It appears to be a compounding curve, not linear.
>>
>> IPv4 exhaustion is a new factor which may or may not impact the next
>> 24 months' projection. There are arguments favoring a slower rate (no
>> more free pool). There are arguments favoring a faster rate
>> (fragmentation from address sales). No one has a crystal ball good
>> enough to know for sure -- the situation is literally unprecedented.
>
> When will router vendors learn to do even simple aggregation before loading
> routes into FIB? It appears that most hardware will have plenty of FIB
> space if this was done. Also that aggregated routes are increasing at a
> slower pace.
>
> Regards,
>
> Baldur
- References:
- FIB Sizing
- From: johnstong at westmancom.com (Graham Johnston)
- FIB Sizing
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- FIB Sizing
- From: baldur.norddahl at gmail.com (Baldur Norddahl)