[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514

Subject: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
From: maz at iij.ad.jp (Matsuzaki Yoshinobu)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:46:26 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Colin Johnston <colinj at gt86car.org.uk> wrote
> even if customer router crash fault, should have been filtered via
> prefix list blocking to only allow customer network prefixs to be
> anounced onwards ? as per best practice

Yes, I agree, and we have done that.  How about peering partners -
which is our case this time.  Is it feasible to maintain strict
inbound prefix filters for all peering relationships?
-----
Matsuzaki Yoshinobu <maz at iij.ad.jp>
 - IIJ/AS2497  INOC-DBA: 2497*629

Follow-Ups:
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
  - From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)

References:
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
  - From: maz at iij.ad.jp (Matsuzaki Yoshinobu)
- AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
  - From: colinj at gt86car.org.uk (Colin Johnston)

Prev by Date: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
Next by Date: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
Previous by thread: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
Next by thread: AW: AW: Prefix-Hijack by AS7514
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread