Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

[dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)]

On 7/15/15 10:24 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
> I suspect a 16 /8 right about now would be very welcome for everybody
> other then the ipv6 adherents.

Globally we were burning through about a /8 every month or two in "the 
good old days." So in the best case scenario we'd get 32 more months of 
easy to get IPv4, but at an overwhelming cost to re-implement every 
network stack.

This option was considered back in the early 2000's when I was still 
involved in the discussion, and rejected as impractical.

-- 
I am conducting an experiment in the efficacy of PGP/MIME signatures. 
This message should be signed. If it is not, or the signature does not 
validate, please let me know how you received this message (direct, or 
to a list) and the mail software you use. Thanks!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150715/75206113/attachment.pgp>