[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
responding to DMARC breakage
- Subject: responding to DMARC breakage
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:49:04 -0400
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400." <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:
> It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the
> choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a
> situation not unlike a really routing table or nameserver, snafu ---
It's more like a peering war. Time for somebody to either bake a cake,
or find alternate transit providers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140412/cd71f642/attachment.bin>