BGPMON Alert Questions

[mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)]

On Thursday, April 03, 2014 02:57:31 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:

> I'm currently seeing ~100 prefixes originating from 4761,
> and an additional 725 transited through 4761.  This
> would not be difficult to handle with prefix lists,
> assuming some level of automation.

Indeed.

I, for example, have an upstream that filters only on 
AS_PATH. Naturally, we are quite aggressive and insistent 
about filtering both on AS_PATH and prefix list across 
interconnects to our downstreams, but if things were to blow 
up on our side, the upstream in question would not be 
protected (unless, of course, they are relying on "max-
prefix" as well).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140403/a20bb49d/attachment.bin>